Demo templateSample copy, placeholder portrait and credentials. Real practice details replace these on hire.

VAWA Self-Petition Psychological Evaluations.

Forensic documentation of battery or extreme cruelty for I-360 self-petitions filed by spouses, children, and parents of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents.

What the report establishes

A VAWA psychological evaluation places the petitioner's experience inside the regulatory definition of "any act or threatened act of violence" or "extreme cruelty" found at 8 C.F.R. §204.2(c)(1)(vi). The evaluation gives the adjudicator the clinical context to read declarations and corroborating records consistently with the petitioner's stated experience.

  • A detailed psychosocial history covering pre-relationship functioning, the course of the qualifying relationship, and the patterns of abusive conduct.
  • Current diagnostic presentation (DSM-5-TR) — most commonly PTSD, persistent depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, or complex trauma sequelae.
  • Functional impairment across occupational, parental, social, and somatic domains, with a description of how impairment maps to the abusive conduct.
  • Validated symptom measures where indicated (PCL-5, PHQ-9, GAD-7), with interpretation appropriate to the petitioner's cultural and language background.
  • A clinical opinion linking the petitioner's findings to the regulatory standard of "battery or extreme cruelty."

Who qualifies for a VAWA evaluation

This evaluation is appropriate for any petitioner pursuing one of the VAWA self-petition pathways:

  • Spousal self-petitioners — current or former spouses (within two years of divorce/death) of a U.S. citizen or LPR.
  • Child self-petitioners — children abused by a U.S. citizen or LPR parent.
  • Parent self-petitioners — parents of an abusive adult U.S. citizen son or daughter (21+).
Trauma-informed by design

The clinical interview structure used in VAWA evaluations is built around the recognition that disclosing intimate-partner abuse is itself a trauma trigger. Pacing, breaks, and grounding are designed in. The aim is a complete record obtained without re-traumatizing the petitioner.

Typical structure of the report

  1. Referral question and identifying information
  2. Sources of information and methods (interviews, records reviewed, instruments administered)
  3. Behavioral observations and mental status during the assessment
  4. Relevant background — family, education, occupation, medical, psychiatric, immigration
  5. Course of the qualifying relationship and the patterns of abusive conduct
  6. Current clinical presentation and DSM-5-TR diagnostic impression
  7. Discussion linking findings to the regulatory standard
  8. Clinical opinion, prognosis, and treatment recommendations
  9. Curriculum vitae appended
The report's structure is designed so the adjudicator can locate every regulatory element on a single page of headers — and so the corroborating records, declaration, and clinical opinion read as one coherent factual record.

Engagement details

  • Format: Secure HIPAA-compliant telehealth nationwide. In-person available NY metro and on request.
  • Languages: English and Spanish without interpretation. Other languages with court-credentialed interpreter, billed at cost.
  • Standard fee: $2,800 flat. Pro bono and reduced-fee slots available each quarter on inquiry.
  • Turnaround: 2–3 weeks from final interview. 7–10 day expedite available.
  • Deliverables: Signed PDF report, CV, and (on request) cover letter to counsel summarizing key findings.

Ready to discuss a VAWA case?

Send the working draft of the I-360 narrative and any preliminary records. Fee quote and timeline returned within one business day.

Request a Consult